Patrick v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
||David Michael Patrick
||Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
||October 26, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
||Susan J. Dlott
||Karen L. Litkovitz
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 6, 2017
ORDER ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Respondents motion to dismiss (Doc. 5) is GRANTED and petitioners petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 (Doc. 1) isDISMISSED with prejudice to refiling after petitioner exhausts his state court remedies. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 9/6/2017. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|August 8, 2017
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that respondent's 5 MOTION to Dismiss be Granted and that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be Dismissed without prejudice on the ground that petitioner has failed to exhaust the available remedy of a del ayed 26(B) application to the Ohio Court of Appeals. A certificate of appealability should not issue in this matter. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith, and therefore Deny petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 8/22/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/8/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?