Peters v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Peters v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution

Peters v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Abdur Rahim Peters
Respondent:	Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Case Number:	1:2016cv01159
Filed:	December 21, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	ADAMS
Presiding Judge:	Timothy S. Black
Presiding Judge:	Stephanie K. Bowman
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 1, 2018	Filing 10 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 9 ) and TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/31/18. (jlm)
January 12, 2018	Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge respectfully recommends the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealabili ty and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 1/26/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 1/12/2018. (kpf)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 1, 2018

Filing 10 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 9 ) and TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/31/18. (jlm)

January 12, 2018

Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge respectfully recommends the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealabili ty and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 1/26/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 1/12/2018. (kpf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peters v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Abdur Rahim Peters
Represented By:	Hal Roger Arenstein
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Represented By:	Hilda Rosenberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?