Correa v. Callum et al
| Fred Correa |
| Callum, Joiner and John/Jane Doe |
| 1:2017cv00300 |
| May 4, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| SCIOTO |
| Michael R. Barrett |
| Stephanie K. Bowman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 45 Report and Recommendation granting 33 and 41 Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 31 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 6/6/18. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
45
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 33 41 Defendants' Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings, 31 Plaintiff's Motion to Further Amend/Correct Complaint. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Defendants' motions for judgment on the pleadings 33 41 should be GRANTED and that Plaintiff's motion to further amend/correct his complaint 31 should be DENIED. This case should be dismissed with prejudice and closed. Objections to R&R due by 5/15/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 5/1/2018. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
