Helm v. Warden, North Central Corectional Complex

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Helm v. Warden, North Central Corectional Complex

Helm v. Warden, North Central Corectional Complex

Defendant:	Warden, North Central Corectional Complex
Petitioner:	Tony Helm
Case Number:	1:2017cv00329
Filed:	May 15, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	HAMILTON
Presiding Judge:	William O. Bertelsman
Presiding Judge:	Stephanie K. Bowman
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 31, 2018	Filing 13 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of theMagistrate Judge (Doc. 12) be, and it hereby is, adopted as thefindings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court;petitioners Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 3), is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 7/31/2018. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 14, 2018	Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 6/28/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 6/14/2018. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 31, 2018

Filing 13 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of theMagistrate Judge (Doc. 12) be, and it hereby is, adopted as thefindings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court;petitioners Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 3), is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 7/31/2018. (jlw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

June 14, 2018

Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 6/28/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 6/14/2018. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Helm v. Warden, North Central Corectional Complex
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Tony Helm
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Warden, North Central Corectional Complex
Represented By:	Hilda Rosenberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?