Thomas v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Thomas v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution

Thomas v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Winston Thomas
Respondent:	Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Case Number:	1:2017cv00396
Filed:	June 12, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Cincinnati Office
County:	MADISON
Presiding Judge:	Timothy S. Black
Presiding Judge:	Stephanie K. Bowman
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 2, 2018	Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and GRANTING 6 Motion to Dismiss filed by Warden, Madison Correctional Institution. A certificate of appealability is DENIED; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § l 9 l 5(a)(3), an appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith; and the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case isTERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/2/18. (jlm)
January 17, 2018	Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION TO DISMISS - It is respectfully recommended that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 6 be GRANTED and the Petition dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusi on, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 1/31/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 1/17/2018. (kpf)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 2, 2018

Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and GRANTING 6 Motion to Dismiss filed by Warden, Madison Correctional Institution. A certificate of appealability is DENIED; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § l 9 l 5(a)(3), an appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith; and the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case isTERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/2/18. (jlm)

January 17, 2018

Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION TO DISMISS - It is respectfully recommended that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 6 be GRANTED and the Petition dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusi on, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 1/31/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 1/17/2018. (kpf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Winston Thomas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Represented By:	William H Lamb
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?