Haywood v. Gifford et al
| Daymond Haywood |
| Nicholas Gifford, Linna Mahlman and Erdos |
| 1:2017cv00398 |
| June 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Cincinnati Office |
| SCIOTO |
| Timothy S. Black |
| Karen L. Litkovitz |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER adopting 53 Report and Recommendation, granting 46 Gifford's Amended Motion for Summary Judgment, denying as moot 44 Gifford's original Motion for Summary Judgment, and denying 51 Haywood's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 9/29/21. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
53
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Defendants motion for summary judgment (Doc. 44 ) be DENIED as moot, and defendants amended motion for summary judgment (Doc. 46 ) be GRANTED. 2. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgm ent (Doc. 51 ) be DENIED. 3. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Court Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith. Objections to R&R due by 8/4/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 07/19/2021 (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
15
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. With the exception of Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Gifford in his individual capacity, all of Plaintiff's claims are DI SMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may proceed only with his Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Gifford in his individual capacity. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/21/17. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this matter be Dismissed for lack of prosecution. Objections to R&R due by 9/6/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/23/2017. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
