Meyers et al v. Cincinnati Board Of Education et al
Plaintiff: Karen Meyers, Cornelia Reynolds and Benyam Taye
Defendant: Cincinnati Board Of Education, Mary Ronan, Ruthenia Jackson and Jeffrey McKenzie
Case Number: 1:2017cv00521
Filed: August 7, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: HAMILTON
Presiding Judge: Timothy S. Black
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER granting 102 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/16/2021. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B) (rrs)
June 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 101 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 6/21/2021. (rrs)
June 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER Establishing Qualified Settlement Fund and Appointing Fund Administrator. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 6/8/2021. (rrs)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 63 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/23/2020. (rrs)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER granting 64 Motion to File Document Under Seal. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/9/2020. (rrs)
January 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 49 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER for the protection of confidential information. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 1/31/2020. (rrs)
May 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER granting 40 Plaintiffs' Motion to Lift Stay. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/29/19. (rrs)
February 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER granting 29 Motion for Leave to Appeal and for Stay pending appeal. The Court hereby STAYS the current action until the Sixth Circuit has ruled on Defendants' appeal. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 2/5/2019. (ss)
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER granting 21 Motion to Amend the complaint. Plaintiffs shall file the amended complaint forthwith. Granting in part and denying in part 13 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as follows: Defendants motion to dismiss Counts II and XI is GRAN TED, and those claims are DISMISSED. Defendants motion to dismiss Counts I, III, IV, VI, VIII, X, and XII are DENIED, and those claims shall proceed. Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs claim for municipal liability (Count V) is GRANTED as to gro und one (unconstitutional policy) and DENIED as to grounds two, three, and four (custom, inadequate training/supervision, ratification). Count V shall so proceed. Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress (Count IX) is DENIED as to ground one (Doc. 21-1 at 202) and GRANTED as to ground two (Id. at 203). Count IX shall so proceed. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 9/24/2018. (ss)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Meyers et al v. Cincinnati Board Of Education et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen Meyers
Represented By: Jennifer Lynn Branch
Represented By: Janaya Trotter Bratton
Represented By: Alphonse Adam Gerhardstein
Represented By: Christine Marie Hammond
Represented By: Carla Leader
Represented By: Gregory Scott Young
Represented By: Michele Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cornelia Reynolds
Represented By: Jennifer Lynn Branch
Represented By: Janaya Trotter Bratton
Represented By: Alphonse Adam Gerhardstein
Represented By: Carla Leader
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benyam Taye
Represented By: Christine Marie Hammond
Represented By: Gregory Scott Young
Represented By: Michele Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cincinnati Board Of Education
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Ronan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ruthenia Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey McKenzie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?