A&P Technology, Inc. v. Laviviere et al

Plaintiff: A&P Technology, Inc.
Defendant: Phillip Lariviere and Highland Industries, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2017cv00534
Filed: August 11, 2017
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Office: Cincinnati Office
County: HAMILTON
Presiding Judge: Timothy S. Black
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 27, 2017 25 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction and expedited discovery 2 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs request for a preliminary injunction is DENIED. Plaintiffs unopposed request for expedited discovery is GRANTED. The parties may conduct expedited, reciprocal discovery to the extent they agree on discoverable information.Defendants motion for prediscovery identification of trade secrets 13 is GRANTED IN PART. Defendants request that P laintiff be required to submit a specific, narrative list of allegedly misappropriated trade secrets prior to discovery is GRANTED to the extent that Defendant need not disclose any information relating to its own trade secrets until Plaintiff has identified its own trade secrets. However, Defendant must engage in good faith discovery that is not related to its own trade secrets forthwith. Plaintiffs identification of the trade secrets at issue in this case may only occur after the partie s have been granted a Protective Order. The Court anticipates that an agreed Protective Order is forthcoming (see 12/15/17 Notation Order). Plaintiffs motion for leave to file instater surreply brief in opposition to Defendants motion for prediscovery identification of trade secrets 22 is DENIED AS MOOT.Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/27/2017. (ss)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: A&P Technology, Inc. v. Laviviere et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: A&P Technology, Inc.
Represented By: Robert J. Bowes, III
Represented By: Steven S. Seasly
Represented By: Kara Day Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillip Lariviere
Represented By: Gregory D Brunton
Represented By: Bruce A. Moore
Represented By: Tyler Tarney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Highland Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Gregory D Brunton
Represented By: Bruce A. Moore
Represented By: Tyler Tarney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?