Rucker v. Hardy et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 20, 2018
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that defendants Holman and Kroger's 9 MOTION to Dismiss be Granted as to plaintiff's claims brought against these defendants under 42 USC 1983 and Denied as to plaintiff's claims brought against defendant s Holman and Kroger under 42 USC 2000a and ORC 4112.02(G; and that plaintiff's 16 MOTION for leave to amend the complaint be Granted in part and plaintiff be granted leave to amend his claims under 42 USCa and ORC 4112.05(B)(1) to clarify w hether he has exhausted his administrative remedies. Objections to R&R due by 8/3/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 7/20/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|May 14, 2018
ORDER denying as moot 20 plaintiff's Motion for Kroger Limited Parternship I/Kroger Company to provide him with copies of video surveillance footage. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 5/14/2018. (art)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?