Mahlenkamp v. Durrani et al
Plaintiff: Kenneth Richard Mahlenkamp
Defendant: MD Abubakar Atiq Durrani and Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv00817
Filed: November 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Timothy S Black
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Defendants Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc., Abubakar Atiq Durrani. (Brockman, James)
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STIPULATION Stipulation Granting Leave to File Answer Out of Time by Defendants Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc., Abubakar Atiq Durrani. (Brockman, James)
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc., Abubakar Atiq Durrani. (Brockman, James)
December 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Abubakar Atiq Durrani. Abubakar Atiq Durrani served on 12/4/2018, answer due 12/26/2018. (jlw)
December 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc.. Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc. served on 12/4/2018, answer due 12/26/2018. (jlw)
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Certificate of Mailing: Certified mailing of summons and complaint through the Clerk's Office pursuant to Local Rule 4.2. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (bjc)
November 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc., Abubakar Atiq Durrani. (bjc)
November 26, 2018 Opinion or Order If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (bjc)
November 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6689447), filed by Kenneth Richard Mahlenkamp. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form, #3 Summons Form) (Maraan, Benjamin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mahlenkamp v. Durrani et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MD Abubakar Atiq Durrani
Represented By: James Foley Brockman
Represented By: Michael Francis Lyon
Represented By: Paul J Vollman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: James Foley Brockman
Represented By: Michael Francis Lyon
Represented By: Paul J Vollman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Richard Mahlenkamp
Represented By: Benjamin M. Maraan, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?