Village of Woodlawn, Ohio v. Pierce Manufacturing Inc.
| Village of Woodlawn, Ohio |
| Pierce Manufacturing Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00496 |
| July 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| William O Bertelsman |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Jared B. Giroux. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 8/30/2019. (eh)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 0648-7085508) of Jared Giroux by Defendant Pierce Manufacturing Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Bickley, Maureen) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by Pierce Manufacturing Inc.. (Bickley, Maureen) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Pierce Manufacturing Inc. on 7/2/2019, answer due 9/3/2019. (Supinger, Emily) |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. (jlw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Village of Woodlawn, Ohio ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6993060), filed by Village of Woodlawn, Ohio. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Contracts, #2 Exhibit B-Lease Purchase Agreement, #3 Exhibit C-Defects-Repairs, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Supinger, Emily) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
