Williams v. Abbott Laboratories et al
Alice Williams |
Abbott Laboratories, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas Inc., AstraZeneca LP, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Limited, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Merck & Co., Inc., The Procter & Gamble Company and The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company |
1:2019cv00498 |
July 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Michael R Barrett |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER transferring case to District of New Jersey. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 7/10/2019. (ss) |
Case transferred to District of New Jersey.Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (ss) |
Case transferred from Ohio Southern has been opened in District of New Jersey [LIVE] as case 2:19-cv-14975, filed 07/10/2019. (sct) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Stay the Proceedings Pending Transfer to MDL by Defendants AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Merck & Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Notice of Potential Tag-Along Actions) (Anderson, Daniel) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #4 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Abbott Laboratories. (Brunton, Gregory) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #4 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Takeda Development Center Americas Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Limited, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.. (Brunton, Gregory) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint by Defendants AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Merck & Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Anderson, Daniel) Modified docket text on 7/9/2019 (sct). |
If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (jlw) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Lydia Reback for Defendants AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Merck & Co., Inc. (Reback, Lydia) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristina S. Dahmann for Defendants AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Merck & Co., Inc. (Dahmann, Kristina) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND originally filed 5/31/2019 in Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. A1902647) by Alice Williams against All Defendants. (eh) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Merck, Sharpe, & Dohme Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Merck, Sharpe, & Dohme Corporation for Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation.. (Anderson, Daniel) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP identifying Corporate Parent AstraZeneca LP for AstraZeneca LP; Corporate Parent AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP for AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP.. (Anderson, Daniel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Common Pleas, case number A 1902647 ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6993067), filed by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, AstraZeneca LP, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B - MDL Order, #3 Exhibit C - Tolling Agreement, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Anderson, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.