Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Keith Johnson |
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Secuirty Administration |
1:2019cv01049 |
December 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Timothy S Black |
Stephanie K Bowman |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER OF CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 1/3/2020. (km) |
Filing 5 JOINT CONSENT OF THE PARTIES TO PROCEED BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE . (Sorkin, Adam) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam R. Sorkin for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Sorkin, Adam) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security served on 12/16/2019, answer due 2/14/2020. (Rake, Michael) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (eh) |
Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number Receipt #0648-723776 (eh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt #0648-7237768 against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Keith Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Notice of Award, #3 Exhibit Time Entries, #4 Summons Form, #5 Summons Form, #6 Summons Form, #7 Summons Form) (Rake, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.