Pettus v. Warden, Franklin Medical Center
LaShawn R. Pettus |
Warden, Franklin Medical Center |
1:2020cv00187 |
March 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Michael R Barrett |
Stephanie K Bowman |
Michael R Merz |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Notation ORDER denying #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for failure to comply with S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 7.3 without prejudice to renewal after compliance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 05/01/2020. (MRM) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 7/2/2020. to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondent Warden, Franklin Medical Center. (Rosenberg, Hilda) |
Filing 14 Notation ORDER finding as moot #12 Objection to Magistrate Judge Order because Petitioner has filed Amended Objections (ECF No. 13)which he expressly says supersede these initial Objections.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 04/22/2020. (MRM) |
Filing 13 Amended Objection to #10 Report and Recommendation by Petitioner LaShawn R. Pettus. (Anzelmo, James) Modified Docket Text and Document Link on 4/23/2020 (bjc). |
Filing 12 Objection to Magistrate Judge Order by Petitioner LaShawn R. Pettus. (Anzelmo, James) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by James Andrew Anzelmo for Petitioner LaShawn R. Pettus (Anzelmo, James) |
Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS- Based on the foregoing analysis, it is respectfully recommended that the Emergency Application (ECF No. #2 ) be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 4/22/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 4/8/2020. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 9 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING RECUSAL: Because Petitioners Affidavit under 28 U.S.C, 144 is legally insufficient, his request for recusal is DENIED. re #8 Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 3/20/2020. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT Pursuant to 28 U.S.C 144 in Re: Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz and Request for Magistrate's Recusal by Petitioner LaShawn R. Pettus. (mdr) |
Filing 7 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING- Accordingly, Petitioners Emergency Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal after the state court record has been filed. In any renewal of the motion, Petitioner must set forth what evidence he expects to present at the requested hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 3/12/2020. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 6 TRANSFER ORDER- With the consent of both of them, the Magistrate Judge reference in this case is transferred from Magistrate Judge Bowman to Magistrate Judge Merz. The case remains assigned to District Judge Barrett for final decision. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 3/12/2020. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Hilda Rosenberg for Respondent Warden, Franklin Medical Center (Rosenberg, Hilda) |
Filing 4 ORDER FOR ANSWER signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 03/05/2020. It is ORDERED that Respondent shall file an answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases within sixty (60) days of the date of filing of this Order. (cb)(This document and copies of the petition and doc. #2 #3 have been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification and to the respondent. A copy of this order, petition, and the two emergency motions filed by petitioner also sent to the Ohio Attorney General at the email addresses listed in this order. ) |
Filing 3 MOTION for an Emergency Evidentiary Hearing by Petitioner LaShawn R. Pettus. (eh) |
Filing 2 Emergency Application for Stay of Execution of State Prison Sentence [28 U.S.C. 2251] & Release on Own Recognizance Bond by Petitioner LaShawn R. Pettus. (eh) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by LaShawn R. Pettus. (Attachments: #1 Ex. 1-17, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Filing Fee Receipt) (eh) Modified on 3/4/2020 (eh). |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 100CIN038901 (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pettus v. Warden, Franklin Medical Center | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden, Franklin Medical Center | |
Represented By: | Hilda Rosenberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: LaShawn R. Pettus | |
Represented By: | James Andrew Anzelmo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.