Cottman v. Churck et al
Plaintiff: Rodney Cottman
Defendant: CEO Churck, Supervisor Melude, No Name and S. W. Shaw
Case Number: 1:2020cv00837
Filed: October 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Timothy S Black
Referring Judge: Karen L Litkovitz
2 Judge: Matthew W McFarland
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2020 Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. (kaf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. #5 ) AND TERMINATING CASE: The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #5 ) in its entirety and DISMISSES Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that for the reasons identified in the Report and Recommendation, an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 12/16/2020. (kaf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
December 14, 2020 Filing 6 Mail sent to Rodney Cottman as to re #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #4 Complaint filed by Rodney Cottman, #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Mail Returned as Undeliverable. . (bjc) Modified to Correct Docket Text on 12/15/2020 (bjc).
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. Objections to R&R due by 12/8/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/24/2020. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 24, 2020 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Churck, Melude, No Name, S. W. Shaw, filed by Rodney Cottman. (bjc)
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 11/24/2020. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Matthew W. McFarland for all further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 11/20/2020. (ss)
October 19, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Case received as scanned without civil cover sheet, copies of the complaint, or completed Summons and USM-285 Forms) by Plaintiff Rodney Cottman. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons and USM-285 forms, #3 Envelope) (eh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cottman v. Churck et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CEO Churck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Supervisor Melude
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: No Name
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. W. Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodney Cottman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?