Kelly v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
| Cynthia Rose Kelly |
| Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2021cv00178 |
| March 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER OF CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Karen L. Litkovitz. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 5/13/21. (ba)
|
| Filing 3 JOINT CONSENT OF THE PARTIES TO PROCEED BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE . (Julis, Rachel) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel Julis for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Julis, Rachel) |
| Set Deadline: Commissioner of Social Security answer due 5/25/2021. (kl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Cynthia Rose Kelly against Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Social Security Identification Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Form, #4 Summons Form, #5 Summons Form) (Allen, Eric) Modified to correct parties on 3/25/2021 (eh). Modified docket text on 3/26/2021 (kl). |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number AOHSDC-8219697 (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
