Paycor, Inc. et al v. Graham et al
Paycor, Inc. and United Healthcare Service Inc |
Kimberly L Graham, Eugene C Graham, Steven Magas and Steven Magas doing business as The Magas Firm |
1:2021cv00191 |
March 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Timothy S Black |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed (Not Effectuated related to COVID19) as to Defendants Eugene C Graham, Kimberly L Graham. Eugene C Graham served on 4/29/2021, answer due 5/20/2021; Kimberly L Graham served on 4/29/2021, answer due 5/20/2021. (kh) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Mailing: Certified mailing of Summons and Complaint through the Clerk's Office pursuant to Local Rule 4.2. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipts) (kh) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Eugene C Graham, Kimberly L Graham, Steven Magas. (bjc) |
If this case is referred it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (bjc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8227369), filed by Paycor, Inc., United Healthcare Service Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 SEctions of the Master Plan, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Form Eugene Graham, #4 Summons Form Kimberly Graham, #5 Summons Form Steven Magas) (Kiefer, Daran) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.