Mollis v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
| Donald P Mollis |
| Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company |
| 1:2022cv00333 |
| June 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Douglas R Cole |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and defenses filed by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (Kersting, Edna) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Defenses filed by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (Kersting, Edna) |
NOTATION ORDER #7 granting Defendant's Amended Unopposed MOTION for Enlargement of Time within which to File its Responsive Pleading to #1 Plaintiff's Complaint. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company shall move, answer, or otherwise plead by 7/28/22. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Douglas R. Cole on 7/21/22. (sct)
|
| Filing 7 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint New date requested 7/28/2022. or otherwise plead New date requested 7/28/2022. [UNOPPOSED} by Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (Kersting, Edna) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint New date requested 7/28/2022. or otherwise plead by Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (Kersting, Edna) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Edna S Kersting for Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Kersting, Edna) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company served on 6/23/2022, answer due 7/14/2022. (kl) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Mailing: Certified mailing of Summons and Complaint through the Clerk's Office pursuant to Local Rule 4.2. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (kh) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Reliance Standard Insurance Company. (kl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Wrongful Termination of Benefits against Reliance Standard Insurance Company, filed by Donald P Mollis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form) (Ahlers, Edward) Modified text on 6/10/2022 (kl). |
| If this case is referred, it will be to Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (kl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mollis v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Donald P Mollis | |
| Represented By: | Edward Christopher Ahlers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Edna S Kersting |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
