Miller v. Apple Inc.
| Timothy Miller |
| Apple Inc. and Microsoft |
| 1:2022cv00468 |
| August 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Barrett |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| Karen L Litkovitz |
| Matthew W McFarland |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. (kaf) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 10
ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ANDSUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Docs. #4 , #9 ): This action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B), because it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Furthermore, pursuant to U.S.C. 1915(a), it is hereby certified that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and that Plaintiff should be denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Matthew W. McFarland on 09/26/2022. (kaf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 9
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #5 Amended Complaint filed by Timothy Miller. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: (1) Plaintiff's amended complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice; (2) The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) that an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. Objections to R&R due by 9/16/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 9/2/2022. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER - The Honorable Karen L. Litkovitz hereby recuses herself from the above-captioned case and hereby transfers the referral of this matter to the docket of Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman for further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 08/27/2022. (bjc)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Matthew W. McFarland for all further proceedings. Judge Susan J. Dlott no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Susan J. Dlott on 8/18/2022. (kh) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Susan J. Dlott for all further proceedings. Judge Michael R. Barrett no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 8/17/2022. (kkz)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple Inc., filed by Timothy Miller. (bjc) |
|
Filing 4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: (1) Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice; and (2) The Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 8/30/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/15/2022. (kh) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Apple Inc., filed by Timothy Miller. (kh) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz on 8/15/2022. (kh) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Timothy Miller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons Form, #4 USM-285 Form) (kh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
