Hawk v. City of Athens
Plaintiff: Gary Hawk
Defendant: City of Athens
Case Number: 2:2009cv01058
Filed: November 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: NOBLE
Presiding Judge: Norah McCann King
Presiding Judge: George C Smith
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 1-4-10. (ga)
November 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Complaint filed by Gary Hawk. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 12/14/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 11/23/2009. (sr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hawk v. City of Athens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Hawk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Athens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?