NetJets Large Aircraft, Inc. et al v. United States of America
Plaintiff: NetJets Large Aircraft, Inc., NetJets International, Inc., NetJets Aviation, Inc. and Executive Jet Management, Inc.
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2011cv01023
Filed: November 14, 2011
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Columbus Office
County: FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge: Terence P Kemp
Presiding Judge: Edmund A Sargus
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7422
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 155 OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 84 Motion to Enlarge Time to Conduct Limited Discovery of Similarly Situated Taxpayers, Pending Resolution of United States' Motion for Reconsideration of Magistrate Judge's April 28, 2014 Opinion and O rder; granting in part and denying in part 85 Motion to Compel. The Court withholds a ruling as to 141 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE and SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION to Compel, 115 MOTION for Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence, and 119 Supplemental MOTION for Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 4/3/2015. (agm1)
February 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 139 OPINION and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE within fourteen (14) days why 84 should not be denied as moot. The Court also ORDERS the United States to submit a supplemental declaration within fourteen (14) days re Doc. 101-1. Parties are directed to Show Cause within fourteen (14) days why the Court should not deny the motions for sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 2/3/2015. (agm1)
January 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 136 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Doc. 103 : the United States' Motion for Summary Judgment on the standing issue is denied; the United States' Motion for Summary Judgment on the 1992 TAM issue is denied; and the Unit ed States' Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of whether NetJets provides taxable transportation under § 4261 is granted. Doc. 61 is granted in part and denied in part: NetJets' Motion for Summary Judgment on the 1992 TAM issu e is granted and NetJets' Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of whether NetJets provides taxable transportation under § 4261 is denied. The United States' and EJM's Motions for Summary Judgment 62 and 93 on the issue of whether EJM provides taxable transportation are denied. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A Sargus on 01/26/2015. (dh1)
September 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER re 09/16/14 Telephone Conference: The Court vacates the settlement conference scheduled for 12/02/14 and will reschedule the conference after Plaintiffs' and Defendant's Motions for Summary Judgment are resolved. The Court will not rule on 106 Defendant's Motion to Have Official with Full Settlement Authority Excused from Attendance at Settlement Conference until a new settlement conference is scheduled. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 09/16/2014. (dh1)
July 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 86 OPINION AND ORDER overruling 66 the Government's objections to 65 Magistrate Judge Kemp's Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 07/11/2014. (dh1)
May 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 74 OPINION AND ORDER granting 72 the United States' Emergency Motion for a Partial Stay, in accordance with this Opinion and Order. The Court also orders the United States to submit a reply brief as to its Motion for Reconsideration no later than 06/03/14. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 05/28/2014. (dh1)
April 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 65 OPINION AND ORDER granting 45 Motion to Compel Production of Documents; granting 46 Motion to Compel Depositions; denying 51 Motion for Protective Order; granting 60 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and File Motions for Summary Judgment & finding as moot 48 Motion for Extension of Time. All discovery shall be completed w/in 60 days of the date of this order & any additional dispositive motions shall be filed w/in 90 days of the date of this order. The pending motion for summary judgment shall be briefed in accordance w/the Court's Local Civil Rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P Kemp on 4/28/2014. (kk2)
August 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER granting 30 the Joint Motion of the Parties to extend the stay of all proceedings in this case until 09/28/2012 so the parties may proceed with private mediation. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 08/21/2012. (dh1)
April 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER granting 28 the parties' Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Private Mediation. The Clerk is directed to STAY all proceedings until 08/28/2012 so the parties may proceed with private mediation. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 04/13/2012. (dh1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NetJets Large Aircraft, Inc. et al v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NetJets Large Aircraft, Inc.
Represented By: Bradley Thomas Ferrell
Represented By: Jonathan D. Hacker
Represented By: Lauren N. Moore
Represented By: Robert A. Rizzi
Represented By: Micah W. Smith
Represented By: John Wolcott Zeiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NetJets International, Inc.
Represented By: Bradley Thomas Ferrell
Represented By: Jonathan D. Hacker
Represented By: Lauren N. Moore
Represented By: Robert A. Rizzi
Represented By: Micah W. Smith
Represented By: John Wolcott Zeiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NetJets Aviation, Inc.
Represented By: Bradley Thomas Ferrell
Represented By: Jonathan D. Hacker
Represented By: Lauren N. Moore
Represented By: Robert A. Rizzi
Represented By: Micah W. Smith
Represented By: John Wolcott Zeiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Executive Jet Management, Inc.
Represented By: Bradley Thomas Ferrell
Represented By: Jonathan D. Hacker
Represented By: Lauren N. Moore
Represented By: Robert A. Rizzi
Represented By: Micah W. Smith
Represented By: John Wolcott Zeiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?