Kiser v. Reitz et al
| Russell Kiser |
| Lili Reitz, Marybeth D Shaffer, Jacinto W Beard, Mary Ellen Wynn, Douglas W. Wallace, Ketki B. Desai, James J. Lawrence, Constance F. Clark, Lawrence B. Kaye, W. Chris Hanners, Linda R. Staley, Clifford Jones, William G. Leffler and Gregory A McDonald |
| 2:2012cv00574 |
| June 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Algenon L. Marbley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER denying 51 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 6/12/2018. (cw)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 36 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 9/12/2017. (cw)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 37 Motion to Stay Discovery; denying 42 Motion to Strike ; granting 43 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 12/21/2016. (mas)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' motion to dismiss. This case is DISMISSED in its entirety. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 3/20/2015. (cw1)
|
|
Filing
17
OPINION AND ORDER granting 6 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 8/13/2013. (pes1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
