Gibbs v. Food Concepts International, LP et al
| Eric Gibbs |
| Food Concepts International, LP, Abuelo's International LP, Darren DelVecchio, Mark Myers and John Doe |
| 2:2013cv00127 |
| February 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Mark R. Abel |
| Algenon L. Marbley |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING with modifications Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney's Fees that was filed in 2:13CV124, Miller v. Food Concepts Case (Doc. 191). Plaintiffs are awarded $420,102.38 in fees and $51,263.40 in costs. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 11/13/2017. (cw)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 77 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants DelVecchio and Myers are hereby DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 3/29/2017. (cw)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER GRANTING [Doc. 125] Motion in Limine to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiffs' opinion witenss Stephen C. Oberhousen in Case No. 2: 13CV0124. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 5/13/2016. (cw)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 38 Report and Recommendations.; denying 19 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 2/18/2014. (cw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
