Tackett v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Tackett v. Commissioner of Social Security

Tackett v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Joanna Lynn Tackett
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	2:2014cv02638
Filed:	December 15, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	PIKE
Presiding Judge:	Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Presiding Judge:	Edmund A Sargus
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 25, 2017	Filing 30 ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's 10/04/2017 Report and Recommendation. No objections have been made to the Report and Recommendation. The Plaintiff's Application to Charge and Collect a Fee 26 is denied as moot, and the Plaintiff&# 039;s Amended Motion to Charge and Collect a Fee 27 is granted. The Court awards Plaintiff attorney fees in the amount of $19,329.50, with a refund to be made to Plaintiff of the $5,750.00 previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 10/25/2017. (dh1)
October 4, 2017	Filing 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs Amended Motion 27 be GRANTED and that Plaintiffs Application to Charge and Collect a Fee 26 be DENIED AS MOOT. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court AWARD Plaintiff attorney fees in the amount of $19,329.50 with a refund to Plaintiff of $5,750. Objections to R&R due by 10/18/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on October 4, 2017. (jlk)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 25, 2017

Filing 30 ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's 10/04/2017 Report and Recommendation. No objections have been made to the Report and Recommendation. The Plaintiff's Application to Charge and Collect a Fee 26 is denied as moot, and the Plaintiff&# 039;s Amended Motion to Charge and Collect a Fee 27 is granted. The Court awards Plaintiff attorney fees in the amount of $19,329.50, with a refund to be made to Plaintiff of the $5,750.00 previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 10/25/2017. (dh1)

October 4, 2017

Filing 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs Amended Motion 27 be GRANTED and that Plaintiffs Application to Charge and Collect a Fee 26 be DENIED AS MOOT. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court AWARD Plaintiff attorney fees in the amount of $19,329.50 with a refund to Plaintiff of $5,750. Objections to R&R due by 10/18/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on October 4, 2017. (jlk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tackett v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joanna Lynn Tackett
Represented By:	John R Stevenson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	John J. Stark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?