Martin v. Posey et al
Ronald Martin |
Cody Posey, Woody Coey, Brent Cruse, Corby Free, Roger Wilson and Gary Mohr |
2:2015cv02294 |
May 29, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
ROSS |
Gregory L. Frost |
Terence P. Kemp |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 ORDER ADOPTING and AFFIRMING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 109 in that 85 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 2/1/18. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 109 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that Defendants' 85 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 1/24/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 1/10/2018. (kpt)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 105 ORDER granting 83 Motion to Quash and 102 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply; denying 51 Motion to Compel and 86 Motion for Leave to Conduct Ex Parte Review; denying as moot 78 Motion for Appointment of a Lay Advoca te, 80 Motion to Stay Dispositive Motions, 97 Motion to Expedite, and 98 Motion for Order to Direct Non-Parties to Comply with Subpoenas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 7/27/2017. (kdp)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 74 ORDER denying 42 , 43 , and 44 Motions for Leave; denying as moot 45 Motion to Compel; denying 46 and 47 Motions to Compel; denying 49 Motion for alternate service; granting 50 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; gr anting 53 Motion to Depose Plaintiff; denying 54 Motion to Appoint Counsel; striking 57 Motion for Mr. Posey to undergo a voice stress analysis; granting 59 Motion for Leave to File sur-reply for the limited purpose of addressing the issu es raised by 51 Motion to Compel; granting 61 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; denying as moot 63 Motion to Stay; denying as moot 70 Motion for Leave to File; denying 71 Motion for Emergency Relief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 1/31/2017. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 25 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 & 15 Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 17 Motion for Leave to File; adopting Report and Recommendations re 22 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 2/29/16. (kn)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified on 2/29/2016 (kn). |
Filing 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER - The Court recommends that the motions to dismiss (ECF 10 and 15 ) be granted in part and denied in part. It is recommended that the motion for leave to amend the complaint (ECF 17 ) be denied. Further, the mo tion to moot the motion to dismiss (ECF 16 ) and the motion for appointment of counsel (ECF 19 ) are denied. Objections to R&R and/or Motions for reconsideration of the Order due within fourteen (14) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 2/5/2016. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.