Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. Caver Brothers Development, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. Caver Brothers Development, Inc.

Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. Caver Brothers Development, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs
Defendant:	Caver Brothers Development, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2015cv02461
Filed:	June 26, 2015
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge:	Norah McCann King
Presiding Judge:	Edmund A. Sargus
Nature of Suit:	Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 22, 2015	Filing 10 ORDER adopting and affirming 9 the Magistrate Judge's 08/27/15 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment 8 is granted. The Clerk is directed to enter FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of plaintiffs and against defendant Caver Brothers Development, Inc., in the amount of $7,154.73 in unpaid fringe benefit contributions, liquidated damages, and prejudgment interest, and attorney's fees in the amount of $1,912.50, plus interest from the date of judgment at the rate of one percent (1%) per month. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 09/22/2015. (dh1)
August 27, 2015	Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 MOTION for Default Judgment against Caver Brothers Development, Inc. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs' Motion be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 9/14/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 8/27/2015. (pes)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 22, 2015

Filing 10 ORDER adopting and affirming 9 the Magistrate Judge's 08/27/15 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment 8 is granted. The Clerk is directed to enter FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of plaintiffs and against defendant Caver Brothers Development, Inc., in the amount of $7,154.73 in unpaid fringe benefit contributions, liquidated damages, and prejudgment interest, and attorney's fees in the amount of $1,912.50, plus interest from the date of judgment at the rate of one percent (1%) per month. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 09/22/2015. (dh1)

August 27, 2015

Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 8 MOTION for Default Judgment against Caver Brothers Development, Inc. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs' Motion be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 9/14/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 8/27/2015. (pes)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. Caver Brothers Development, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs
Represented By:	Steven Louis Ball
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Caver Brothers Development, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?