Saunders v. Luthern Social Services of Central Ohio Faith Mission et al
| Joachim Saunders |
| Luthern Social Services of Central Ohio Faith Mission and Faith Mission of Luthern Social Services |
| 2:2015cv03100 |
| December 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Gregory L. Frost |
| Norah McCann King |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 2 Report and Recommendations,, 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joachim Saunders. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 1/21/16. (kn)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
2
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and 2 Complaint filed by Joachim Saunders. It is RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that this action be di smissed for failure to state a claim for relief. Objections to R&R due by 1/19/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 12/30/2015. (pes)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
