Jefferson v. Mohr et al
| Sell Jefferson |
| Gary Mohr, Andre Imbrogno, Jason Bunting and Cynthia Mauser |
| 2:2016cv00369 |
| April 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Terence P. Kemp |
| Edmund A. Sargus |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's 18 Objection. The Court ADOPTS AND AFFIRMS the Magistrate Judge's 15 Report and Recommendation granting 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 14 Motion for L eave to File. Plaintiff's claims are accordingly, DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 7/13/2017. (mas)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
15
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that Mr. Jefferson's 14 MOTION for Leave to File a supplemental reply & Defendants' 11 MOTION TO DISMISS be granted and this case be dismissed. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 1/17/2017. (er)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
