Steele et al v. Jenkins et al
| Charles M. Steele and Jerome Royster |
| Charlotte Jenkins, Parks, Cathy Pummill and Coleen Bethel |
| 2:2016cv00727 |
| July 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| ROSS |
| Kimberly A. Jolson |
| George C. Smith |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER adopting and affirming re 6 Report and Recommendations; denying 2 Motion for TRO and Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 10/6/2016. (kk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification [Charles M Steele, 306-310 & Jerome Royster, 141-662, both at Chillicothe Correctional Institution, PO Box 5500, Chillicothe OH 45601])
|
|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motions for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Docs. 1 , 4 , 5 ); RECOMMENDS DISMISSING the complaint (Doc. 1 -2); and RECOMMENDS DENYING the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order an d Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 2 ). Objections to R&R due by 9/19/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 9/1/2016. (pes)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
