Economy Linen and Towel Service, Inc. v. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Teamsters Local Union 637
Economy Linen and Towel Service, Inc. |
The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Teamsters Local Union 637 |
2:2016cv00952 |
October 3, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
MUSKINGUM |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Michael H. Watson |
Labor/Management Relations |
29 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Economy Linen and Towel Service, Inc. v. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Teamsters Local Union 637 | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Economy Linen and Towel Service, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Timothy G Pepper |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Teamsters Local Union 637 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.