McCall et al v. Fedex Corporation et al
Bondary McCall, Albert McCall and Richard McCall |
Fedex Corporation |
2:2017cv00381 |
May 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Columbus Office |
FRANKLIN |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
George C. Smith |
Other Personal Property Damage |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER granting 53 Defendant FedEx Office & Print Services, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs claims against FedEx have been dismissed, so if FedEx no longer wishes to prosecute its third party claim against Fumble Recovery, FedEx should file a notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure so that the Court may close this case. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 5/10/18. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 55 ORDER denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 3/30/18. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 10 OPINION AND ORDER granting 3 Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous. Defendant John Husted is dismissed from the case. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 5/23/2017. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.