Banks v. Twenty to Forty unknown named agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Pittsburgh Field Office et al
| Frederick Banks |
| Twenty to Forty unknown named agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Pittsburgh Field Office, Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar, Soo Song, Sean Langford, Robert Werner, Scott Smith, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mike Pompeo and Central Intelligence Agency |
| 2:2017cv00520 |
| June 16, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| FRANKLIN |
| Kimberly A. Jolson |
| Michael H. Watson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER adopting 2 the Report and Recommendation; denying 1 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 9/11/17. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
2
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED and RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff be GRANTED 30 days to either pay the filing fee or submit the proper form. Objections to R&R due by 7/3/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 6/19/2017. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
