Amnathphonthip v. Warden, North Central Correctional Complex

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Amnathphonthip v. Warden, North Central Correctional Complex

Amnathphonthip v. Warden, North Central Correctional Complex

Petitioner:	Xay X. Amnathphonthip
Respondent:	Warden, North Central Correctional Complex
Case Number:	2:2017cv01129
Filed:	December 21, 2017
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge:	Kimberly A. Jolson
Presiding Judge:	Michael H. Watson
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 24, 2018	Filing 17 OPINION and ORDER adopting and affirming 15 the Report and Recommendation; granting 10 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 8/24/18. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
July 26, 2018	Filing 15 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Xay X. Amnathphonthip, 10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Warden, North Central Correctional Complex in that it is RECOMMENDED that Respondent's Mo tion to Dismiss be GRANTED and that this action be DISMISSED. Petitioner's request to expand the record with a copy of the transcript of his guilty plea hearing is also DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/9/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 7/26/18. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 24, 2018

Filing 17 OPINION and ORDER adopting and affirming 15 the Report and Recommendation; granting 10 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 8/24/18. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

July 26, 2018

Filing 15 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Xay X. Amnathphonthip, 10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Warden, North Central Correctional Complex in that it is RECOMMENDED that Respondent's Mo tion to Dismiss be GRANTED and that this action be DISMISSED. Petitioner's request to expand the record with a copy of the transcript of his guilty plea hearing is also DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/9/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 7/26/18. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amnathphonthip v. Warden, North Central Correctional Complex
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Xay X. Amnathphonthip
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, North Central Correctional Complex
Represented By:	William H Lamb
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?