Lee v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Lee v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Lee v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Defendant:	Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Petitioner:	Jalen D Lee
Case Number:	2:2018cv00561
Filed:	June 7, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Columbus Office
County:	LICKING
Presiding Judge:	James L. Graham
Presiding Judge:	Chelsey M. Vascura
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 10, 2018	Filing 6 OPINION AND ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 3 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 7/10/2018. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
June 8, 2018	Filing 3 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Petitioner's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Petitioner shall be PERMITTED to prosecute this action without prepayment of fees or costs and judicial officers w ho render services in this action will do so as if costs had been prepaid. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED. Petitioner's request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 6/22/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 6/8/2018. (kpt)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 10, 2018

Filing 6 OPINION AND ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 3 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 7/10/2018. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

June 8, 2018

Filing 3 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Petitioner's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Petitioner shall be PERMITTED to prosecute this action without prepayment of fees or costs and judicial officers w ho render services in this action will do so as if costs had been prepaid. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED. Petitioner's request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 6/22/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 6/8/2018. (kpt)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Jalen D Lee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?