Vance v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Lewis J. Vance
Respondent: Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Case Number: 2:2019cv00687
Filed: February 25, 2019
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Referring Judge: James L Graham
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2019 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Indigency for Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Lewis J. Vance. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (er)
April 25, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Petitioner Lewis J. Vance. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (er)
April 25, 2019 Filing 6 Additional Exhibiting Evidentiary Documents - Newly Discovered Evidence by Lewis James Vance. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (er)
March 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that Respondent shall file an answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases within SIXTY (60) DAYS of the date of this Order. Answer due 5/19/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on March 20, 2019. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 20, 2019 Set/Reset Deadlines: Warden, Noble Correctional Institution answer due 5/19/2019. (jlk)
March 18, 2019 Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Lewis J. Vance. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits to Petition, #3 Notes re Petition, #4 Envelope) (er)
February 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel; granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner shall re-submit this action on the correct form, clearly identifying the convictions being challenged, the nature of his claims, and facts in support within 21 DAYS. Due by 3/20/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on February 27, 2019. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
February 27, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Petitioner Lewis J. Vance. (jlk)
February 27, 2019 Set/Reset Deadlines: re #3 Order. Deficiency Deadline to re-submit form by 3/20/2019. (jlk)
February 25, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: Habeas Petition and Civil Cover Sheet.) by Petitioner Lewis J. Vance. (Attachments: #1 Motion to Appoint Counsel, #2 Letter, #3 Envelope) (daf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vance v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lewis J. Vance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?