Kessling v. Ohio State University et al
| 2:2020cv01719 |
| September 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
Omnibus Opinion and Order on 77 , 78 , 79 , 92 , 93 , 95 Motions in Limine. Defendants' 77 Motion to Bifurcate Trial on Punitive Damages and to Exclude Wealth Evidence from Liability Stage is GRANTED. Defendants' 78 , 79 Motion In Limine Regarding the Questioning of Witnesses at Trial is DENIED as to Defendant Lloyd and is GRANTED as to all other defense witnesses. Kessling's 92 Motion to Permit Evidence Regarding Actions 4 , 6 , 8 , and 19 is GRANTED; Defendant s' 78 , 79 cross-motion to exclude is DENIED as to those actions and is GRANTED in all other respects. Kessling's 93 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding to Her Work Performance is DENIED. Kessling's 94 Motion in Limin e to Exclude References to the Court's Dismissal of Parties and Claims and to the Findings of the Ohio Civil Rights Commission is GRANTED. Defendants' 95 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding the Investigation in which Kessling Participated is GRANTED as to statements made by individuals other than Kessling prior to and during the investigation and DENIED in all other respects.. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 10/16/2023. (merc)
|
|
Filing
72
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 69 Plaintiffs Motion to Strike and for Leave to File a Sur-reply and GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 51 Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment. Remaining for trial are Plaintiffs retaliation claims under Title VII and Title IX against Defendant Ohio State University and her First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Patrick Lloyd in his individual capacity. Signed by Judge Sarah D. Morrison on 11/21/2022. (merc)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting Oral Motion for Protective Order; denying without prejudice Oral Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 9/29/2021. (agm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kessling v. Ohio State University et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
