Parks v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation et al
| 2:2020cv03229 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Columbus Office |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER adopting 17 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 12/9/2020. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
17
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Because all Defendants are immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment, the Complaint should be dismissed without prejudice to a new suit naming persons in their individual capacities. The Court should certify to the Si xth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.Objections to R&R due by 12/1/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 11/17/2020. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Parks v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
