Preston et al v. DeWine et al
| Citizens of Ohio, American Victims and Joy Preston |
| Lancaster Ohio Domestic Relations Court, Sonya Marshall, Columbus Metropolitian Houseing, Laura B. Smith, Zach Klien, Bill Clinton, Andrew Ginther, Mike DeWine, Hillary Clinton, Child Protective Services, Dave Yost and Authority - Alvis |
| 2:2020cv05923 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Other Statutes: False Claims Act (SEALED) |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will conduct an initial screening of the Complaint and will then enter an appropriate order and direct service of summons and complaint on Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on November 18, 2020. (jlk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: Summons Forms, US Marshal Forms, and Service Documents) by Plaintiff Joy Preston. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (daf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
