Kissinger v. Corcent, LLC et al
| Chris Kissinger |
| Corcent, LLC and Braden Gueth |
| 2:2021cv04753 |
| September 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Edmund A Sargus |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Hearing: Initial Conference set for 12/2/2021 12:00 PM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura. (agm) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint filed by All Defendants. (Schneider, Keith) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Keith W Schneider for Defendants Corcent, LLC, Braden Gueth (Schneider, Keith) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Braden Gueth. The Defendant was served on 9/30/2021, answer due 10/21/2021. (daf) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by the Clerk: A copy of the complaint and issued summons was sent to the named defendant via certified mail. (daf) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Corcent, LLC, and Braden Gueth. (daf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Corcent, LLC, Braden Gueth ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8508960), filed by Chris Kissinger. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form to Braden Gueth, #3 Summons Form to Corcent, LLC) (Baishnab, Robi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
