Lytle v. Wright et al
| Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
| Julia Lytle |
| Anthony W Wright |
| American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO health Plan |
| 2:2021cv05757 |
| December 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| James L Graham |
| Chelsey M Vascura |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
NOTATION ORDER GRANTING #10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8688824) of Darryl Anderson as Co-Counsel. Co-Counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 02/28/20. (ds)
|
|
Filing 11
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL ORDER: Initial Disclosures due by 2/25/2022; Joinder of Parties & Motions to Amend due by 3/15/2022; Primary Expert due by 7/1/2022; Rebuttal Expert due by 8/15/2022; Discovery (Fact) due by 8/1/2022; Discovery (Expert) due by 9/30/2022; Dispositive motions due by 11/15/2022; Settlement Demand due by 2/4/2022; Response to Settlement Demand due by 3/4/2022; The parties intend to privately mediate this case with mediator Craig Scott after initial discovery is complete. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 1/25/2022. (kk2)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8688824) of Darryl Anderson by Defendant American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO health Plan. (Kiefer, Daran) |
| Statistical Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 1/25/2022. (agm) |
| NOTICE of Hearing: Initial Conference RE-SET for 1/25/2022 at 2:00 PM via Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura. *This is a time change only.* (agm) |
| Filing 9 RULE 26(f) REPORT by Plaintiff Julia Lytle. (Tyack, Jonathan) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #3 Answer to Complaint, Crossclaim, Counterclaim of Defendant APWU filed by Julia Lytle. (Tyack, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Hearing: Initial Conference set for 1/25/2022 12:00 PM in Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura. (agm) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #3 Crossclaim filed originally in Fairfield County CPC on 12/6/2021 by Anthony W Wright. (er) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand filed originally in Fairfield County CPC on 12/6/2021 by Anthony W Wright. (er) |
| Filing 4 State Court Record from Fairfield County Court of Common Pleas (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kk2) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint , CROSSCLAIM against Anthony W Wright, COUNTERCLAIM against Julia Lytle filed by American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO health Plan. (Kiefer, Daran) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed originally in Fairfield County CPC on 11/3/2021 by Julia Lytle against American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO health Plan, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company & Anthony W Wright. (er) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by the American Postal Wokers Union from Fairfield County Common Pleas Court, case number 21 CV 510 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8635394), filed by American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO health Plan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B State Court Service, #4 Exhibit C Full OPM Contract with APWU, #5 Exhibit D 2019 Statement of Benefits for APWU Health Plan, #6 Exhibit E Opinion in Shaw v. APWU Health Plan) (Kiefer, Daran) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
