Clegg v. Warden, Lake Erie Correctional Institution
| Louis H Clegg, Jr. |
| Warden, Lake Erie Correctional Institution |
| 2:2022cv00503 |
| February 8, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Stephanie K Bowman |
| James L Graham |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER TO ANSWER - It is hereby ORDERED that Respondent shall file an answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases within 60 days of the date of filing of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 3/22/2022. (kh) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification, respondent and the Attorney General of Ohio, Habeas Corpus Unit of the Corrections Litigation Section.)
|
| Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 200COL068771 (daf) |
|
Filing 2
DEFICIENCY ORDER - IT IS ORDERED THAT within 30 days of the date of filing of this Order, petitioner shall pay the full filing fee of $5.00 or submit a completed Application and Affidavit By Incarcerated Person to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees form, including the "Certificate" page (page 8 of the application and affidavit to proceed without prepayment of fees that is used in this Court, completed and signed by the institutional cashier) showing the balance of his prisoner account. Petitioner is advised that his failure to comply with this Order will result in the dismissal of this action for want of prosecution. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to submit to petitioner an Application and Affidavit By Incarcerated Person to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees form. A copy of this Deficiency Order shall be sent to the cashier of the prison at which petitioner is confined. Show Cause Response due by 3/18/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 2/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner IFP Application and Affidavit) (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Louis H Clegg, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Env.) (jlk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clegg v. Warden, Lake Erie Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Louis H Clegg, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden, Lake Erie Correctional Institution | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
