Chatman v. Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Sherri C. Chatman |
Postmaster General, United States Postal Service |
2:2022cv03277 |
August 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Edmund A Sargus |
Chelsey M Vascura |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 10/25/2022. (cmw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 8 OPINION AND ORDER adopting ECF #6 Report and Recommendation. This case is closed. Signed by Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 10/25/2022. (cmw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 7 This entry is for statistical purposes only. Please see ECF No #6 for the document. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 6 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued in that the 9/2/22 Report and Recommendation is VACATED and the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. It is RECOMMENDED that the Court DISMISS this action pursuant to 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Objections to R&R due by 10/3/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 9/19/22. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Postmaster General, United States Postal Service filed by Sherri C. Chatman. (sem) |
Filing 4 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Sherri C. Chatman. (er) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Sherri C. Chatman be DENIED and that she be ordered to pay the required $402.00 filing fee within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS if she intends to proceed. Objections to R&R due by 9/16/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 09/02/2022. (tla)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Sherri C. Chatman. (daf) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Sherri C. Chatman. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (daf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chatman v. Postmaster General, United States Postal Service | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sherri C. Chatman | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Postmaster General, United States Postal Service | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.