Garner v. Jagtrux, Inc. et al
Carl Garner |
Jagtrux, Inc. and Sherman Lueng |
2:2022cv03444 |
September 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
James L Graham |
Chelsey M Vascura |
Motor Vehicle |
23 U.S.C. ยง 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Jagtrux, Inc., Jagtrux, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Jagtrux, Inc. for Jagtrux, Inc... (Bogdewiecz, Joseph) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Jagtrux, Inc. and Sherman Lueng. (Bogdewiecz, Joseph) Modified docket text to add missing defendant on 11/7/2022 (agm). |
Set/Reset Deadlines pursuant to #5 STIPULATION: Jagtrux, Inc. answer due 11/4/2022; Sherman Lueng answer due 11/4/2022. (agm) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION Extension of Time to Move or Plead by Defendants Jagtrux, Inc., Sherman Lueng. (Wilson, Jennifer) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Jagtrux, Inc., Sherman Lueng. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form) (ds) |
Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. to Sherman Leung (Shore, Jesse) |
Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. to Jagtrux, Inc. (Shore, Jesse) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9051756), filed by Carl Garner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Shore, Jesse) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.