Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. RK Family, Inc. et al
| Twin City Fire Insurance Company |
| RK Family, Inc., RK Holdings, LLP doing business as Rural King and Shaun Amrine |
| 2:2024cv02275 |
| May 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Kimberly A Jolson |
| Algenon L Marbley |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to RK Family, Inc. on 6/9/2024, answer due 8/8/2024; RK Holdings, LLP on 6/9/2024, answer due 8/8/2024. (Pearson, Marcia) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Plaintiff Twin City Fire Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Pearson, Marcia) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Twin City Fire Insurance Company. (Pearson, Marcia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Declaratory Judgment against Shaun Amrine, RK Family, Inc., RK Holdings, LLP dba Rural King ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-9961141), filed by Twin City Fire Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A-Ohio Charge, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B-Amended Complaint of Norman Lawsuit, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C-Criminal Proceedings, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D-Twin City Policy) (Pearson, Marcia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
