Stubbs v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Rocky A. Stubbs |
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution |
2:2024cv03696 |
July 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Algenon L Marbley |
Peter B Silvain |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF DOCUMENT by Respondent Warden, Noble Correctional Institution re #6 Notice of Appearance (Mullin, Katherine) |
Filing 6 ***WITHDRAWN per Notice #7 *** NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine E. Mullin for Respondent Warden, Noble Correctional Institution (Mullin, Katherine) Removed counsel from docket on 8/21/2024 (er). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by William H Lamb for Respondent Warden, Noble Correctional Institution (Lamb, William) |
Filing 4 ORDER - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondent shall file an answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases within sixty (60) days of the date of filing of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr on 8/15/2024. (acw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification and via email along with Document #1 to the Attorney General of Ohio, Habeas Corpus Unit of the Corrections Litigation Section.) |
Habeas Filing fee received: $5, receipt number 200006900. (mas) |
Filing 3 **Updated Notice of Deficiency re: Requires a filing fee or motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Related Document: #1 Complaint filed by Rocky A. Stubbs. (sem) |
Filing 2 Notice of Deficiency: The Court's docket reflects the initiation of the above referenced civil action. The initiating material contains the following deficiency(ies):Filing Fee Missing. The materials do not include the filing fee ($5) or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (provided).Account Statement Missing. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis does not contain a copy of Plaintiff's trust fund account statement. (See 28 USC 1915)Account Statement Not Certified. The Plaintiff 's trust fund account statement is not certified by the prison cashier. (See 28 USC 1915) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner IFP) (er)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS filed by Rocky A. Stubbs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) (er) Modified text on 7/12/2024 (er). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stubbs v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Rocky A. Stubbs | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden, Noble Correctional Institution | |
Represented By: | William H Lamb |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.