Atlantica LLC v. Salahuddin
Atlantica LLC |
Ameena Salahuddin |
2:2024cv04098 |
October 24, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Kimberly A Jolson |
Sarah D Morrison |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 OBJECTION to #9 Report and Recommendations by Defendant Ameena Salahuddin. (Salahuddin, Ameena) |
Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED. Objections to R&R due by 12/10/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 11/26/2024. (er)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Defendant Ameena Salahuddin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit Defendant Answer and Counterclaim) (Salahuddin, Ameena) |
Filing 7 NOTATION ORDER - In light of the Court's Show Cause Order (Doc. #4 ), the Court STAYS Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendant's Motion to Stay (Doc. #3 ). As such, Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of Time (Doc. #6 ) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 11/5/24. (jr) |
Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 1/6/2025. by Plaintiff Atlantica LLC. (Covey, LeAnn) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by LeAnn E Covey for Plaintiff Atlantica LLC (Covey, LeAnn) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Defendant's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #2 Defendant's Motion by Pro Se Litigant to Obtain Electronic Case Filing Rights. Defendant is ADVISED that the Court may, in its discretion, revoke or restrict her electronic filing privileges at any time should she abuse this privilege or fail to comply with the Local Rules. Defendant is ORDERED to show cause on or before November 12, 2024, and explain the basis for the Courts jurisdiction over this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 10/29/2024. (er)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Stay Pending Appeal, by Defendant Ameena Salahuddin. (mve) |
Filing 2 MOTION by Pro Se Litigant to Obtain Electronic Case Filing Rights, by Defendant Ameena Salahuddin. (mve) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Defendant Ameena Salahuddin. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (mve) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Atlantica LLC v. Salahuddin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ameena Salahuddin | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Atlantica LLC | |
Represented By: | Suzana Pastor |
Represented By: | Laura C. Infante |
Represented By: | LeAnn E Covey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.