Bur-Tex Hosiery, Inc. v. Gooden
Plaintiff: Bur-Tex Hosiery, Inc.
Defendant: Brad Gooden
Case Number: 2:2025cv00060
Filed: January 22, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth Preston Deavers
Referring Judge: Algenon L Marbley
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Brad Gooden ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-10338317), filed by Bur-Tex Hosiery, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form for Brad Gooden) (Mulrane, Kelly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bur-Tex Hosiery, Inc. v. Gooden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bur-Tex Hosiery, Inc.
Represented By: Kelly E. Mulrane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brad Gooden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?