Prunest v. Commissioner of Social Security
||Commissioner of Social Secuirty
||June 2, 2008
||US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
||Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
||Sharon L Ovington
||Thomas M Rose
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||U.S. Government Defendant
|Jury Demanded By:
||42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 29, 2009
DECISION AND ENTRY: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on July 10, 2009 (Doc. 11 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. The Commissioner's non-disability finding is VACATED; 3. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff Mona Prunest was under a "dis ability" within the meaning of the Social Security Act; 4. This case is remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry and the Report and Recommendations; and 5. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M Rose on 7/29/09. (bev1, )
|July 10, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 Complaint filed by Mona Prunest - IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. The Commissioners non-disability finding be vacated; 2. No finding be made as to whether Plaintiff Mona Prunest was under a disability within the meaning of the Social Security Act; 3. This case be remanded to the Commissioner and the Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Report; and 4. The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 7/27/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 07/10/09. (phil1, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?