Miller v. Alza Corporation et al
||Alza Corporation, Novartis Phamaceuticals Corporation, Sandoz Inc, Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation and John Does
||October 31, 2008
||US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
||Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office
||Thomas M Rose
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
||28:1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 17, 2010
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED with regard to the following claims, which are dismissed: Plaintiff's Failure to Warn/Inadequate Warning Claim asserted; Plaintiff's claims of negligence and negligent misrepresentation; Plainitff's breach of warranty claims; Plaintiff's claims asserting fraud upon the FDA; and Plaintiff's request for punitive damages. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/17/10. (lk1)
|June 2, 2010
RESPONSE TO STATUS REPORT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 6/2/2010. (kpf1)
|May 12, 2010
STATUS INQUIRY - Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge requests counsel to advise the Court in writing not later than June 1, 2010, of the status of preparation of this case for trial. In particular, do counsel expect to complete any case-specific discov ery by the cut-off of June 21, 2010? If not, what proposals do counsel have for completion of discovery? Do the parties still desire the entry of a protective order? The case remains set for trial to a jury on February 28, 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 5/12/2010. (kpf1)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?