Jamison v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
| Brian A. Jamison |
| Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution |
| 3:2009cv00297 |
| August 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Walter H Rice |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 28 ) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTION THERETO (DOC. # 32 ); OVERRULING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. # 26 ) AND PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR ANEXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL (DOC. # 27 ). Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 4/10/2012. (mdf1)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER. The Application for Stay 33 is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/29/2012. (mdf1)
|
|
Filing
28
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is respectfully recommended that because Petitioner's appeal is untimely, it is not taken in objective good faith and his Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 26 ) should be denied on that basis. Objections to R&R due by 3/19/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 2/29/2012. (mdf1)
|
|
Filing
24
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 17 ) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. # 23 ); JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT AND AGAINST PETITIONER, DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. # 2 ) IN ITS ENTIRETY; CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS DENIED; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 09/23/11. (pb1)
|
|
Filing
20
DECISION AND ORDER - This case is before the Court on correspondence from Petitioner which has been docketed so as to avoid its being an ex parte communication (Doc. No. 18). Petitioner advises that he has not yet received a copy of the Magistrate J udge's Report and Recommendations of January 31, 2011, although he had heard about it from his family. The Clerk will send a new copy of the Report to Petitioner at DCI and his time to file objections will run for seventeen days from today or until February 28, 2011. Petitioner's Motion Opposing Transfer is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 2/9/2011. (kpf1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jamison v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Brian A. Jamison | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
